Sequence 1
14 CLINICAL STUDIES 14.1 Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Abdominal Surgery in Patients at Risk for Thromboembolic Complications Abdominal surgery patients at risk include those who are over 40 years of age, obese, undergoing surgery under general anesthesia lasting longer than 30 minutes or who have additional risk factors such as malignancy or a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). In a double-blind, parallel group study of patients undergoing elective cancer surgery of the gastrointestinal, urological, or gynecological tract, a total of 1116 patients were enrolled in the study, and 1115 patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 32 to 97 years (mean age 67 years) with 52.7% men and 47.3% women. Patients were 98% Caucasian, 1.1% Black, 0.4% Asian and 0.4% others. Lovenox 40 mg subcutaneously, administered once a day, beginning 2 hours prior to surgery and continuing for a maximum of 12 days after surgery, was comparable to heparin 5000 U every 8 hours subcutaneously in reducing the risk of DVT. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 14 ). Table 14: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Abdominal Surgery Dosing Regimen Indication Lovenox 40 mg daily subcutaneously n (%) Heparin 5000 U q8h subcutaneously n (%) All Treated Abdominal Surgery Patients 555 (100) 560 (100) Treatment Failures Total VTE VTE = Venous thromboembolic events which included DVT, PE, and death considered to be thromboembolic in origin (%) 56 (10.1) (95% CI CI = Confidence Interval : 8 to 13) 63 (11.3) (95% CI: 9 to 14) DVT Only (%) 54 (9.7) (95% CI: 7 to 12) 61 (10.9) (95% CI: 8 to 13) In a second double-blind, parallel group study, Lovenox 40 mg subcutaneously once a day was compared to heparin 5000 U every 8 hours subcutaneously in patients undergoing colorectal surgery (one-third with cancer). A total of 1347 patients were randomized in the study and all patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 92 years (mean age 50.1 years) with 54.2% men and 45.8% women. Treatment was initiated approximately 2 hours prior to surgery and continued for approximately 7 to 10 days after surgery. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 15 ). Table 15: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Colorectal Surgery Dosing Regimen Indication Lovenox 40 mg daily subcutaneously n (%) Heparin 5000 U q8h subcutaneously n (%) All Treated Colorectal Surgery Patients 673 (100) 674 (100) Treatment Failures Total VTE VTE = Venous thromboembolic events which included DVT, PE, and death considered to be thromboembolic in origin (%) 48 (7.1) (95% CI CI = Confidence Interval : 5 to 9) 45 (6.7) (95% CI: 5 to 9) DVT Only (%) 47 (7.0) (95% CI: 5 to 9) 44 (6.5) (95% CI: 5 to 8) 14.2 Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery Lovenox has been shown to reduce the risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following hip or knee replacement surgery. In a double-blind study, Lovenox 30 mg every 12 hours subcutaneously was compared to placebo in patients with hip replacement. A total of 100 patients were randomized in the study and all patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 41 to 84 years (mean age 67.1 years) with 45% men and 55% women. After hemostasis was established, treatment was initiated 12 to 24 hours after surgery and was continued for 10 to 14 days after surgery. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 16 ). Table 16: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Hip Replacement Surgery Dosing Regimen Indication Lovenox 30 mg q12h subcutaneously n (%) Placebo q12h subcutaneously n (%) All Treated Hip Replacement Patients 50 (100) 50 (100) Treatment Failures Total DVT (%) 5 (10) p value versus placebo = 0.0002 23 (46) Proximal DVT (%) 1 (2) p value versus placebo = 0.0134 11 (22) A double-blind, multicenter study compared three dosing regimens of Lovenox in patients with hip replacement. A total of 572 patients were randomized in the study and 568 patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 31 to 88 years (mean age 64.7 years) with 63% men and 37% women. Patients were 93% Caucasian, 6% Black, <1% Asian, and 1% others. Treatment was initiated within two days after surgery and was continued for 7 to 11 days after surgery. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 17 ). Table 17: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Hip Replacement Surgery Dosing Regimen Indication 10 mg daily subcutaneously n (%) 30 mg q12h subcutaneously n (%) 40 mg daily subcutaneously n (%) All Treated Hip Replacement Patients 161 (100) 208 (100) 199 (100) Treatment Failures Total DVT (%) 40 (25) 22 (11) p value versus Lovenox 10 mg once a day = 0.0008 27 (14) Proximal DVT (%) 17 (11) 8 (4) p value versus Lovenox 10 mg once a day = 0.0168 9 (5) There was no significant difference between the 30 mg every 12 hours and 40 mg once a day regimens. In a double-blind study, Lovenox 30 mg every 12 hours subcutaneously was compared to placebo in patients undergoing knee replacement surgery. A total of 132 patients were randomized in the study and 131 patients were treated , of which 99 had total knee replacement and 32 had either unicompartmental knee replacement or tibial osteotomy. The 99 patients with total knee replacement ranged in age from 42 to 85 years (mean age 70.2 years) with 36.4% men and 63.6% women. After hemostasis was established, treatment was initiated 12 to 24 hours after surgery and was continued up to 15 days after surgery. The incidence of proximal and total DVT after surgery was significantly lower for Lovenox compared to placebo. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 18 ). Table 18: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Total Knee Replacement Surgery Dosing Regimen Indication Lovenox 30 mg q12h subcutaneously n (%) Placebo q12h subcutaneously n (%) All Treated Total Knee Replacement Patients 47 (100) 52 (100) Treatment Failures Total DVT (%) 5 (11) p value versus placebo = 0.0001 (95% CI CI = Confidence Interval : 1 to 21) 32 (62) (95% CI: 47 to 76) Proximal DVT (%) 0 (0) p value versus placebo = 0.013 (95% Upper CL CL = Confidence Limit : 5) 7 (13) (95% CI: 3 to 24) Additionally, in an open-label, parallel group, randomized clinical study, Lovenox 30 mg every 12 hours subcutaneously in patients undergoing elective knee replacement surgery was compared to heparin 5000 U every 8 hours subcutaneously. A total of 453 patients were randomized in the study and all were treated. Patients ranged in age from 38 to 90 years (mean age 68.5 years) with 43.7% men and 56.3% women. Patients were 92.5% Caucasian, 5.3% Black, and 0.6% others. Treatment was initiated after surgery and continued up to 14 days. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was lower for Lovenox compared to heparin. Extended Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Hip Replacement Surgery: In a study of extended prophylaxis for patients undergoing hip replacement surgery, patients were treated, while hospitalized, with Lovenox 40 mg subcutaneously, initiated up to 12 hours prior to surgery for the prophylaxis of postoperative DVT. At the end of the peri-operative period, all patients underwent bilateral venography. In a double-blind design, those patients with no venous thromboembolic disease were randomized to a post-discharge regimen of either Lovenox 40 mg (n=90) once a day subcutaneously or to placebo (n=89) for 3 weeks. A total of 179 patients were randomized in the double-blind phase of the study and all patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 47 to 87 years (mean age 69.4 years) with 57% men and 43% women. In this population of patients, the incidence of DVT during extended prophylaxis was significantly lower for Lovenox compared to placebo. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 19 ). Table 19: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Extended Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis following Hip Replacement Surgery Post-discharge Dosing Regimen Indication (Post Discharge) Lovenox 40 mg daily subcutaneously n (%) Placebo daily subcutaneously n (%) All Treated Extended Prophylaxis Patients 90 (100) 89 (100) Treatment Failures Total DVT (%) 6 (7) p value versus placebo = 0.008 (95% CI CI= Confidence Interval : 3 to 14) 18 (20) (95% CI: 12 to 30) Proximal DVT (%) 5 (6) p value versus placebo = 0.537 (95% CI: 2 to 13) 7 (8) (95% CI: 3 to 16) In a second study, patients undergoing hip replacement surgery were treated, while hospitalized, with Lovenox 40 mg subcutaneously, initiated up to 12 hours prior to surgery. All patients were examined for clinical signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease. In a double-blind design, patients without clinical signs and symptoms of VTE disease were randomized to a post-discharge regimen of either Lovenox 40 mg (n=131) once a day subcutaneously or to placebo (n=131) for 3 weeks. A total of 262 patients were randomized in the study double-blind phase and all patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 44 to 87 years (mean age 68.5 years) with 43.1% men and 56.9% women. Similar to the first study the incidence of DVT during extended prophylaxis was significantly lower for Lovenox compared to placebo, with a statistically significant difference in both total DVT (Lovenox 21 [16%] versus placebo 45 [34%]; p=0.001) and proximal DVT (Lovenox 8 [6%] versus placebo 28 [21%]; p=<0.001). 14.3 Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Patients with Severely Restricted Mobility during Acute Illness In a double blind multicenter, parallel group study, Lovenox 20 mg or 40 mg once a day subcutaneously was compared to placebo in the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in medical patients with severely restricted mobility during acute illness (defined as walking distance of <10 meters for ≤3 days). This study included patients with heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV); acute respiratory failure or complicated chronic respiratory insufficiency (not requiring ventilatory support): acute infection (excluding septic shock); or acute rheumatic disorder (acute lumbar or sciatic pain, vertebral compression [due to osteoporosis or tumor], acute arthritic episodes of the lower extremities). A total of 1102 patients were enrolled in the study, and 1073 patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 40 to 97 years (mean age 73 years) with equal proportions of men and women. Treatment continued for a maximum of 14 days (median duration 7 days). When given at a dose of 40 mg once a day subcutaneously, Lovenox significantly reduced the incidence of DVT as compared to placebo. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 20 ). Table 20: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Patients with Severely Restricted Mobility during Acute Illness Dosing Regimen Lovenox 20 mg daily subcutaneously Lovenox 40 mg daily subcutaneously Placebo Indication n (%) n (%) n (%) All Treated Medical Patients during Acute Illness 351 (100) 360 (100) 362 (100) Treatment Failure Treatment failures during therapy, between Days 1 and 14 Total VTE VTE = Venous thromboembolic events which included DVT, PE, and death considered to be thromboembolic in origin (%) 43 (12.3) 16 (4.4) 43 (11.9) Total DVT (%) 43 (12.3) (95% CI CI = Confidence Interval : 8.8 to 15.7) 16 (4.4) (95% CI : 2.3 to 6.6) 41 (11.3) (95% CI : 8.1 to 14.6) Proximal DVT (%) 13 (3.7) 5 (1.4) 14 (3.9) At approximately 3 months following enrollment, the incidence of venous thromboembolism remained lower in the Lovenox 40 mg treatment group versus the placebo treatment group. 14.4 Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis with or without Pulmonary Embolism In a multicenter, parallel group study, 900 patients with acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with or without pulmonary embolism (PE) were randomized to an inpatient (hospital) treatment of either (i) Lovenox 1.5 mg/kg once a day subcutaneously, (ii) Lovenox 1 mg/kg every 12 hours subcutaneously, or (iii) heparin intravenous bolus (5000 IU) followed by a continuous infusion (administered to achieve an aPTT of 55 to 85 seconds). A total of 900 patients were randomized in the study and all patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 18 to 92 years (mean age 60.7 years) with 54.7% men and 45.3% women. All patients also received warfarin sodium (dose adjusted according to PT to achieve an International Normalization Ratio [INR] of 2.0 to 3.0), commencing within 72 hours of initiation of Lovenox or standard heparin therapy, and continuing for 90 days. Lovenox or standard heparin therapy was administered for a minimum of 5 days and until the targeted warfarin sodium INR was achieved. Both Lovenox regimens were equivalent to standard heparin therapy in reducing the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (DVT and/or PE). The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 21 ). Table 21: Efficacy of Lovenox in Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis with or without Pulmonary Embolism Dosing Regimen All patients were also treated with warfarin sodium commencing within 72 hours of Lovenox or standard heparin therapy. Lovenox 1.5 mg/kg daily subcutaneously Lovenox 1 mg/kg q12h subcutaneously Heparin aPTT Adjusted Intravenous Therapy Indication n (%) n (%) n (%) All Treated DVT Patients with or without PE 298 (100) 312 (100) 290 (100) Patient Outcome Total VTE VTE = venous thromboembolic event (DVT and/or PE) (%) 13 (4.4) The 95% Confidence Intervals for the treatment differences for total VTE were: Lovenox once a day versus heparin (-3.0 to 3.5) Lovenox every 12 hours versus heparin (-4.2 to 1.7) 9 (2.9) 12 (4.1) DVT Only (%) 11 (3.7) 7 (2.2) 8 (2.8) Proximal DVT (%) 9 (3.0) 6 (1.9) 7 (2.4) PE (%) 2 (0.7) 2 (0.6) 4 (1.4) Similarly, in a multicenter, open-label, parallel group study, patients with acute proximal DVT were randomized to Lovenox or heparin. Patients who could not receive outpatient therapy were excluded from entering the study. Outpatient exclusion criteria included the following: inability to receive outpatient heparin therapy because of associated comorbid conditions or potential for non-compliance and inability to attend follow-up visits as an outpatient because of geographic inaccessibility. Eligible patients could be treated in the hospital, but ONLY Lovenox patients were permitted to go home on therapy (72%). A total of 501 patients were randomized in the study and all patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 19 to 96 years (mean age 57.8 years) with 60.5% men and 39.5% women. Patients were randomized to either Lovenox 1 mg/kg every 12 hours subcutaneously or heparin intravenous bolus (5000 IU) followed by a continuous infusion administered to achieve an aPTT of 60 to 85 seconds (in-patient treatment). All patients also received warfarin sodium as described in the previous study. Lovenox or standard heparin therapy was administered for a minimum of 5 days. Lovenox was equivalent to standard heparin therapy in reducing the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 22 ). Table 22: Efficacy of Lovenox in Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis Dosing Regimen All patients were also treated with warfarin sodium commencing on the evening of the second day of Lovenox or standard heparin therapy. Lovenox 1 mg/kg q12h subcutaneously Heparin aPTT Adjusted Intravenous Therapy Indication n (%) n (%) All Treated DVT Patients 247 (100) 254 (100) Patient Outcome Total VTE VTE = venous thromboembolic event (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism [PE]). (%) 13 (5.3) The 95% Confidence Intervals for the treatment difference for total VTE was: Lovenox versus heparin (-5.6 to 2.7). 17 (6.7) DVT Only (%) 11 (4.5) 14 (5.5) Proximal DVT (%) 10 (4.0) 12 (4.7) PE (%) 2 (0.8) 3 (1.2) 14.5 Prophylaxis of Ischemic Complications in Unstable Angina and Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction In a multicenter, double-blind, parallel group study, patients who recently experienced unstable angina or non–Q-wave myocardial infarction were randomized to either Lovenox 1 mg/kg every 12 hours subcutaneously or heparin intravenous bolus (5000 U) followed by a continuous infusion (adjusted to achieve an aPTT of 55 to 85 seconds). A total of 3171 patients were enrolled in the study, and 3107 patients were treated. Patients ranged in age from 25 to 94 years (median age 64 years), with 33.4% of patients female and 66.6% male. Race was distributed as follows: 89.8% Caucasian, 4.8% Black, 2.0% Asian, and 3.5% other. All patients were also treated with aspirin 100 to 325 mg per day. Treatment was initiated within 24 hours of the event and continued until clinical stabilization, revascularization procedures, or hospital discharge, with a maximal duration of 8 days of therapy. The combined incidence of the triple endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina was lower for Lovenox compared with heparin therapy at 14 days after initiation of treatment. The lower incidence of the triple endpoint was sustained up to 30 days after initiation of treatment. These results were observed in an analysis of both all-randomized and all-treated patients. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 23 ). Table 23: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Prophylaxis of Ischemic Complications in Unstable Angina and Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction (combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina) Dosing Regimen All patients were also treated with aspirin 100 to 325 mg per day. Lovenox 1 mg/kg q12h subcutaneously Heparin aPTT Adjusted Intravenous Therapy Reduction (%) p Value Indication n (%) n (%) All Treated Unstable Angina and Non–Q-Wave MI Patients 1578 (100) 1529 (100) - - Time point Evaluation time points are after initiation of treatment. Therapy continued for up to 8 days (median duration of 2.6 days). 48 Hours 96 (6.1) 112 (7.3) 1.2 0.120 14 Days 261 (16.5) 303 (19.8) 3.3 0.017 30 Days 313 (19.8) 358 (23.4) 3.6 0.014 The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction at all time points was lower for Lovenox compared to standard heparin therapy, but did not achieve statistical significance. The efficacy data are provided below (see Table 24 ). Table 24: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Prophylaxis of Ischemic Complications in Unstable Angina and Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction (Combined endpoint of death or myocardial infarction) Dosing Regimen All patients were also treated with aspirin 100 to 325 mg per day. Lovenox 1 mg/kg q12h subcutaneously Heparin aPTT Adjusted Intravenous Therapy Reduction (%) p Value Indication n (%) n (%) All Treated Unstable Angina and Non–Q-Wave MI Patients 1578 (100) 1529 (100) Time point Evaluation time points are after initiation of treatment. Therapy continued for up to 8 days (median duration of 2.6 days). 48 Hours 16 (1.0) 20 (1.3) 0.3 0.126 14 Days 76 (4.8) 93 (6.1) 1.3 0.115 30 Days 96 (6.1) 118 (7.7) 1.6 0.069 In a survey one year following treatment, with information available for 92% of enrolled patients, the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina remained lower for Lovenox versus heparin (32.0% vs 35.7%). Urgent revascularization procedures were performed less frequently in the Lovenox group as compared to the heparin group, 6.3% compared to 8.2% at 30 days (p=0.047). 14.6 Treatment of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction In a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were to be hospitalized within 6 hours of onset and were eligible to receive fibrinolytic therapy were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Lovenox or unfractionated heparin. Study medication was initiated between 15 minutes before and 30 minutes after the initiation of fibrinolytic therapy. Unfractionated heparin was administered beginning with an intravenous bolus of 60 U/kg (maximum 4000 U) and followed with an infusion of 12 U/kg per hour (initial maximum 1000 U per hour) that was adjusted to maintain an aPTT of 1.5 to 2 times the control value. The intravenous infusion was to be given for at least 48 hours. The Lovenox dosing strategy was adjusted according to the patient's age and renal function. For patients younger than 75 years of age, Lovenox was given as a single 30 mg intravenous bolus plus a 1 mg/kg subcutaneous dose followed by a subcutaneous injection of 1 mg/kg every 12 hours. For patients at least 75 years of age, the intravenous bolus was not given and the subcutaneous dose was reduced to 0.75 mg/kg every 12 hours. For patients with severe renal insufficiency (estimated creatinine clearance of less than 30 mL per minute), the dose was to be modified to 1 mg/kg every 24 hours. The subcutaneous injections of Lovenox were given until hospital discharge or for a maximum of eight days (whichever came first). The mean treatment duration for Lovenox was 6.6 days. The mean treatment duration of unfractionated heparin was 54 hours. When percutaneous coronary intervention was performed during study medication period, patients received antithrombotic support with blinded study drug. For patients on Lovenox, the PCI was to be performed on Lovenox (no switch) using the regimen established in previous studies, i.e. no additional dosing, if the last subcutaneous administration was less than 8 hours before balloon inflation, intravenous bolus of 0.3 mg/kg Lovenox if the last subcutaneous administration was more than 8 hours before balloon inflation. All patients were treated with aspirin for a minimum of 30 days. Eighty percent of patients received a fibrin-specific agent (19% tenecteplase, 5% reteplase and 55% alteplase) and 20% received streptokinase. Among 20,479 patients in the ITT population, the mean age was 60 years, and 76% were male. Racial distribution was: 87% Caucasian, 9.8% Asian, 0.2% Black, and 2.8% other. Medical history included previous MI (13%), hypertension (44%), diabetes (15%) and angiographic evidence of CAD (5%). Concomitant medication included aspirin (95%), beta-blockers (86%), ACE inhibitors (78%), statins (70%) and clopidogrel (27%). The MI at entry was anterior in 43%, non-anterior in 56%, and both in 1%. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death from any cause or myocardial re-infarction in the first 30 days after randomization. Total follow-up was one year. The rate of the primary efficacy endpoint (death or myocardial re-infarction) was 9.9% in the Lovenox group, and 12% in the unfractionated heparin group, a 17% reduction in the relative risk, (P=0.000003) (see Table 25 ). Table 25: Efficacy of Lovenox in the Treatment of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Lovenox (N=10,256) UFH (N=10,223) Relative Risk (95% CI) P Value Note: Urgent revascularization denotes episodes of recurrent myocardial ischemia (without infarction) leading to the clinical decision to perform coronary revascularization during the same hospitalization. CI denotes confidence intervals. Outcome at 48 hours n (%) n (%) Death or Myocardial Re-infarction 478 (4.7) 531 (5.2) 0.90 (0.80 to 1.01) 0.08 Death 383 (3.7) 390 (3.8) 0.98 (0.85 to 1.12) 0.76 Myocardial Re-infarction 102 (1.0) 156 (1.5) 0.65 (0.51 to 0.84) <0.001 Urgent Revascularization 74 (0.7) 96 (0.9) 0.77 (0.57 to 1.04) 0.09 Death or Myocardial Re-infarction or Urgent Revascularization 548 (5.3) 622 (6.1) 0.88 (0.79 to 0.98) 0.02 Outcome at 8 Days Death or Myocardial Re-infarction 740 (7.2) 954 (9.3) 0.77 (0.71 to 0.85) <0.001 Death 559 (5.5) 605 (5.9) 0.92 (0.82 to 1.03) 0.15 Myocardial Re-infarction 204 (2.0) 379 (3.7) 0.54 (0.45 to 0.63) <0.001 Urgent Revascularization 145 (1.4) 247 (2.4) 0.59 (0.48 to 0.72) <0.001 Death or Myocardial Re-infarction or Urgent Revascularization 874 (8.5) 1181 (11.6) 0.74 (0.68 to 0.80) <0.001 Outcome at 30 Days Primary efficacy endpoint (Death or Myocardial Re-infarction) 1017 (9.9) 1223 (12.0) 0.83 (0.77 to 0.90) 0.000003 Death 708 (6.9) 765 (7.5) 0.92 (0.84 to 1.02) 0.11 Myocardial Re-infarction 352 (3.4) 508 (5.0) 0.69 (0.60 to 0.79) <0.001 Urgent Revascularization 213 (2.1) 286 (2.8) 0.74 (0.62 to 0.88) <0.001 Death or Myocardial Re-infarction or Urgent Revascularization 1199 (11.7) 1479 (14.5) 0.81 (0.75 to 0.87) <0.001 The beneficial effect of Lovenox on the primary endpoint was consistent across key subgroups including age, gender, infarct location, history of diabetes, history of prior myocardial infarction, fibrinolytic agent administered, and time to treatment with study drug (see Figure 1 ); however, it is necessary to interpret such subgroup analyses with caution. Figure 1: Relative Risks of and Absolute Event Rates for the Primary Endpoint at 30 Days in Various Subgroups The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death from any cause or myocardial re-infarction in the first 30 days. The overall treatment effect of Lovenox as compared to the unfractionated heparin (UFH) is shown at the bottom of the figure. For each subgroup, the circle is proportional to the number and represents the point estimate of the treatment effect and the horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals. Fibrin-specific fibrinolytic agents included alteplase, tenecteplase, and reteplase. Time to treatment indicates the time from the onset of symptoms to the administration of study drug (median: 3.2 hours). The beneficial effect of Lovenox on the primary endpoint observed during the first 30 days was maintained over a 12 month follow-up period (see Figure 2 ). Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Plot – Death or Myocardial Re-infarction at 30 Days – ITT Population There is a trend in favor of Lovenox during the first 48 hours, but most of the treatment difference is attributed to a step increase in the event rate in the UFH group at 48 hours (seen in Figure 2), an effect that is more striking when comparing the event rates just prior to and just subsequent to actual times of discontinuation. These results provide evidence that UFH was effective and that it would be better if used longer than 48 hours. There is a similar increase in endpoint event rate when Lovenox was discontinued, suggesting that it too was discontinued too soon in this study. The rates of major hemorrhages (defined as requiring 5 or more units of blood for transfusion, or 15% drop in hematocrit or clinically overt bleeding, including intracranial hemorrhage) at 30 days were 2.1% in the Lovenox group and 1.4% in the unfractionated heparin group. The rates of intracranial hemorrhage at 30 days were 0.8% in the Lovenox group and 0.7% in the unfractionated heparin group. The 30-day rate of the composite endpoint of death, myocardial re-infarction or ICH (a measure of net clinical benefit) was significantly lower in the Lovenox group (10.1%) as compared to the heparin group (12.2%). Figure 1 Figure 2